Skip to main content

Digitization Equipment Review: The CopiBook

The Copibook is an overhead scanner from a company in France called i2s.

It's sold here in America by iimage Retrieval. Although they have many fine products, I am only reviewing the CopiBook.

The machine runs off of an internal computer and can output to a network, to another computer, or to a flash drive.

The equipment is easy to use, and easy to train. I can get someone working on it in 5 minutes for simple stuff, and 10 minutes for more complex items.

The CopiBook is designed to work with ambient light. It does this by making a “light map” of the whole scanning area. If there is a shadow, it will adjust the brightness of the scan in that area. If there is excessive light in another area, it will lower the brightness in that area. So, you get a very clean flat image. For people who have problems with lighting, you can add light to the machine as needed or move the machine to a better light location (where the light is more consistent etc.)

The image quality is wonderful. At 300 DPI it scans in color quickly enough to make scanning by hand a good experience. Although it doesn’t turn the pages automatically like the Kirtas machines, it does present a level of automation by having optional settings to automatically take an image when the glass plate is down and then release the glass plate when it is done.

In addition to being a decent book scanner, the CopiBook also scans flat images up to the size of one page of newspaper (still at 300 DPI).

Some of the coolest features about the software is automatic processing (cropping, de-skew, sharpening, curvature correction for pages), but all these slow down the scanning a bit if turned on. The automatic crop feature is fantastic, and will crop any size object placed anywhere on the scanning surface a large percentage of the time. This works well if you are doing lots of lose pages, because you don’t have to worry about getting the page centered each time.

Overall, I’ve been very happy with the CopiBook purchased for our digital lab. It’s speeded up 3 projects so far. One was estimated to take another month and was done in a day with the CopiBook. Another is a project with magazines, and it scanned them quickly with little or no glare (mostly because of the ambient lighting).

Expect to pay a lot for this kind of equipment. The grayscale version offers some savings, but to me it seems hardly worth it. The color is one of the seeling features of this item.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Documentation and Good Management in Digital Libraries

This month is all about self-evaluations for me and my employees.  Because of this, I have been thinking about how a manager is supposed to show their work and their worth. The easy answer is to say that if the employees are doing well, then the supervisor is good. It could be that the employees are doing well despite a bad supervisor. An employee doing badly is also not a sign of a bad supervisor. So what tangible thing can I say makes me a good or bad supervisor? Throughout the year, I try to focus on the actions I take to make my employees' lives at work better. I try to give them direction, advice, and help make things easier. I also try to champion them. Things do not always work but I adjust. When I sit down to write my own evaluation, though, I end up writing about documentation. To me, that is a concrete indicator of a good supervisor. They care enough about the work, and their employees, to write things down and make a record. I want to challenge everyone to write

The Workload Iceberg for Digital Collections and Initiatives

In the last few weeks, I was asked to write a small paragraph explaining my area to others in the library.  I was happy to do this, as many people say they don’t know what my people do.  It’s sometimes hard to explain to others what we do without going into overtly technical topics and terms.  If we have done our job right, we’re practically invisible, which is the way it should be.  Anyway, writing the description made me realize why there is often a mis-match between what we do and what people think we do.  I’ll let you read the description yourself.  I’ve underlined the important bit. “Digital Resources is primarily an Open Access publisher.  We publish both born digital items (produced by students or faculty), and we scan to publish or republish old items. We curate digital collections through the whole digital life-cycle. Our work is a bit different from other departments because the more work we finish; the more work we create in having to maintain the collections. We’re no

HathiTrust and Local Digital Stewardship

An article I had been working on for a bit with Heidi Winkler finally got published in the second volume of the International Journal of Librarianship in a special issue on Data Librarianship . Abstract This article reviews the influence that massive digital libraries like the HathiTrust Digital Library can have on local, smaller institutions’ digitization, preservation, and curation programs. The history of HathiTrust’s digital preservation efforts as a Trusted Repository is reviewed. A case study is presented showing how one academic library made difficult digital stewardship decisions in a modern world of globally federated preservation initiatives. The authors introduce the concept of deselection as part of the digital curation process and discuss how digital collection administrators can refine their local digital preservation efforts to better reflect the realities of constrained human and financial resources. Read more...