Skip to main content

The Basics: File size

File size is important when you are trying to make an image available on-line because it has to be good quality enough that it’s useful, but small enough that it can be loaded into a browser without having the patron wait. Also, if you want to archive the images, then you want a high quality archival image without being too hefty on memory.

There are a few things that affect file size:

The type of file affects file size. See the post about file types.

Whether you are saving in full color, grayscale, or black and white also affects it. Typically, full color images are going to be large files. Grayscale is slightly smaller, but still much greater than black and white. However, you have some options when saving in full color or grayscale.

8 Bit or 24 bit Color/Grayscale

You can save a color or grayscale image as either 8 bit or 24 bit color or grayscale.

8-bit
8 bit means that there are 8 bits that describe each pixel. This means that you have 256 different combination of bits to show 256 different colors (or levels of grayscale).

For most images, 8 bit color and grayscale should be enough.

24-bit
24 bit color (Also known as True color), gives 24 bits of information per pixel, meaning that there are 16,777,216 different colors that each pixel can have. While this gives you the greatest range of color, it also makes the file size much greater.

24 bit color is useful if you need a very accurate reproduction of color.

1-bit
Black and white is essentially 1 bit color. It means that there is only one bit of information per pixel, and that information is either a 1 or a 0 (either white or black). This is the smallest file you can have, and is perfect for clear text.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Atiz scanner and Kirtas scanner aren’t playing nice with eachother

I love the Atiz scanner for it's simplicity, good design, and utility. I love the Kirtas scanners for their speed and their "wow" factor when people see the things work. The only problem I have at the moment is taking our current Kirtas workflow (using Kirtas's software Bookscan Editor, Superbatch, and OCR manager), and finding a way to make the Atiz scanner workflow work with it. The Atiz machine came with a hefty batch editing program that does a great job of cleaning up the images and making them wonderfully presentable. The machine even came with a PDF maker, but it doesn't OCR on its own, and it doesn't give you the options that Kirtas' OCR manager do. So, I want to process the Atiz scanner finished images using Kirtas’s OCR manager. However, that seems to be more difficult than I had first expected. For the next month, I’ll be trying to figure out how to make this marriage of Atiz and Kirtas systems work. If it ends up failing, then I may have t...
4 comments
Read more

Ex Libris Digital Preservation system

Today I attended a webinar from Sun Microsystems about the new Ex Libris Digital Preservation system. You can view the webinar here . The talking points are they handle all the hardware and they can handle the software. They claim it’s secure and built with redundancy. The major problem is that they say you can’t provide access to the files without getting Primo (Ex Libris’s new Amazon-like catalog toy-which is looking fun). They won’t convert the files for you when the formats out of style, but they make it so that you can maintain and upgrade the files. All and all, I like the idea of a comprehensive digital preservation system being handled by people who know hardware. I Just think it is going to be too expensive for most libraries. Time will tell how many libraries pick this up.
5 comments
Read more

Microfilm and Microfiche scanners

I have been researching high speed microfiche and microfilm scanners for the last year. There are four major companies that produce microform scanners. Mekel (a Crowley Company), Wicks and Wilson , nextScan ,and Sunrise . They each have their advantages and disadvantages. Both nextScan and Sunrise have 3-in-1 or 2-in-1 models, where you have one machine (~$100,000) that comes with one attachment, and you buy other attachments for different types of microform (Microfilm, Microfiche, and Aperture card). Each attachment costs extra. I never figured out the cost for the attachments. nextScan also has a dedicated roll film scanner , that I’ve heard good reviews from the Newspaper Digitization Project in Australia . In general, I have heard that the 3-in-1 or 2-in-1 machines are fine, but they tend to go slower than dedicated machines. They really are built for versatility and marketed toward libraries who can only afford one machine that can do all types (Paying $100,000+ for one...
4 comments
Read more