Skip to main content

Ex Libris Digital Preservation system

Today I attended a webinar from Sun Microsystems about the new Ex Libris Digital Preservation system. You can view the webinar here.

The talking points are they handle all the hardware and they can handle the software. They claim it’s secure and built with redundancy. The major problem is that they say you can’t provide access to the files without getting Primo (Ex Libris’s new Amazon-like catalog toy-which is looking fun). They won’t convert the files for you when the formats out of style, but they make it so that you can maintain and upgrade the files.

All and all, I like the idea of a comprehensive digital preservation system being handled by people who know hardware. I Just think it is going to be too expensive for most libraries. Time will tell how many libraries pick this up.

Comments

Carl Grant said…
Joy: As one of the presenters at the webinar yesterday, please allow me to clarify a few things you said in your post:

1. While SUN is an Ex Libris partner and did sponsor the webinar, the product is purely Ex Libris developed, sold, installed, maintained. Sun’s involvement would be IF the customer wanted to run on their hardware, which of course, is an excellent choice, but is also NOT a necessity. The software can run on numerous hardware platforms, so the customer does have the option to explore other hardware platforms.

2. We provide interfaces to access tools, we just don’t bundle one in DPS. So the system is really a lot more than just a place to park files. We mentioned that we supported standards like Z39.50/SRU/SRW -- all standards that support standardized search interfaces and thus permit you to use a wide variety of access tools. Of course, PRIMO would be an excellent choice as well, although I’m unclear what you mean by Amazon like “toy”? (Perhaps you meant “tool”?).

3. With regard to converting and/or migrating files, you might have missed the part where we briefly mentioned that as part of our Charter Customer Program, we’re looking for partners to help us further develop the basic tools that Yaniv described in the Q&A section (which might be what you’re referring to when you said “make is so that you can”). Migrating files will be a continuing process for the life of preservation systems and, in many ways, is just at the starting line, so what we’ve built is a system that will make it possible to plug that functionality in as it is developed and made available.

4. As for the cost of the system, we’d encourage organizations to contact us for a price quote. We think you might be pleasantly surprised. Especially when one considers the investment that could be lost if a preservation solution isn’t put into place!
Joy said…
Carl,

Thank you for clarifying those points. I admit that I did not get to stick around to attend the question and answer section of the webinar.

Just to clarify, what I meant by "toy" was that Primo was looking fun compared to other catalogs. I have edited the post to refelect that.
Joy said…
cg's full name and affiliation:

Carl Grant
President
Ex Libris North America
dwallen said…
i was under the impression that the DPS would be made up of three parts -- the base component would be digitool -- then there were two other parts befoer you get a full blown DPS -- this way there is a path for going to a full DPS system
Joy said…
I believe there was a few levels of service you could get. You can take a look at the presentation linked from the main post to check for sure. I think the presentation also had contact information for service representatives so you could ask them directly.

Popular posts from this blog

Documentation and Good Management in Digital Libraries

This month is all about self-evaluations for me and my employees.  Because of this, I have been thinking about how a manager is supposed to show their work and their worth. The easy answer is to say that if the employees are doing well, then the supervisor is good. It could be that the employees are doing well despite a bad supervisor. An employee doing badly is also not a sign of a bad supervisor. So what tangible thing can I say makes me a good or bad supervisor? Throughout the year, I try to focus on the actions I take to make my employees' lives at work better. I try to give them direction, advice, and help make things easier. I also try to champion them. Things do not always work but I adjust. When I sit down to write my own evaluation, though, I end up writing about documentation. To me, that is a concrete indicator of a good supervisor. They care enough about the work, and their employees, to write things down and make a record. I want to challenge everyone to write

Bureau of Indian Affairs- Digital Collection

The Bureau of Indian Affairs is one of the oldest Bureaus in the United States.  It was established in 1824 by Secretary of War John C. Calhoun . While the history of the organization has been controversial, their records are open to the public.  This collection brings together letters distributed from the Bureau of Indian Affairs starting in 1832 and going on into 1966. View the rest of the collection:  http://bit.ly/2h0hKvW 

The Workload Iceberg for Digital Collections and Initiatives

In the last few weeks, I was asked to write a small paragraph explaining my area to others in the library.  I was happy to do this, as many people say they don’t know what my people do.  It’s sometimes hard to explain to others what we do without going into overtly technical topics and terms.  If we have done our job right, we’re practically invisible, which is the way it should be.  Anyway, writing the description made me realize why there is often a mis-match between what we do and what people think we do.  I’ll let you read the description yourself.  I’ve underlined the important bit. “Digital Resources is primarily an Open Access publisher.  We publish both born digital items (produced by students or faculty), and we scan to publish or republish old items. We curate digital collections through the whole digital life-cycle. Our work is a bit different from other departments because the more work we finish; the more work we create in having to maintain the collections. We’re no