Skip to main content

Atiz scanner and Kirtas scanner aren’t playing nice with eachother

I love the Atiz scanner for it's simplicity, good design, and utility. I love the Kirtas scanners for their speed and their "wow" factor when people see the things work.

The only problem I have at the moment is taking our current Kirtas workflow (using Kirtas's software Bookscan Editor, Superbatch, and OCR manager), and finding a way to make the Atiz scanner workflow work with it.

The Atiz machine came with a hefty batch editing program that does a great job of cleaning up the images and making them wonderfully presentable. The machine even came with a PDF maker, but it doesn't OCR on its own, and it doesn't give you the options that Kirtas' OCR manager do. So, I want to process the Atiz scanner finished images using Kirtas’s OCR manager. However, that seems to be more difficult than I had first expected.

For the next month, I’ll be trying to figure out how to make this marriage of Atiz and Kirtas systems work. If it ends up failing, then I may have to look into a separate option to OCR the images batched with the Atiz software. What am I thinking about? An OCR server that we are buying for another project. We’ll see how that goes.

Comments

Joy said…
Let me clarify my problem:

The Atiz scanner takes the same kind of pictures as the Kirtas scanner does (that is, with the spine of the book being at the top of the image). The Kirtas machines record whether an image is a right or left hand side page by what camera it was taken with. It records this through XML files. It’s a brilliant method of recording it so that the batching software can treat the left hand side pages different than the right side pages. However, the Atiz scanner doesn’t record that metadata, so when you try to batch the Atiz scanner images, the software treats them all the same and half the images end up being upside down if you don’t pre-rotate them.

What I would like to do is either be able to use Bookscan Editor (Kirta’s software) to completely batch the images and have it rotate them correctly without the metadata (possibly by letting me tell the program whether odd or even images are left or right), or to have the OCR manager be able to OCR images that have been batched processed by other programs.
Unknown said…
I sold both robots to TX Tech. I'm also familiar with Atiz. A suggestion would be to consider LuraTech's PDF compression tool that gives you OCR for free (unlimited, one core license). It is the best choice for back end and much lest expensive then a per license $3k fee for OCR. I can give you more info if you need it. Then you have the best of all worlds.
Joy said…
The info would be greatly appriciated. Free OCR is always a good option. I would like to at least look at it.
Unknown said…
Sure Joy. My email is lisa@yourdigitalsource.net and phone is (770)364-7309. I'm happy to share my experience.

Popular posts from this blog

Microfilm and Microfiche scanners

I have been researching high speed microfiche and microfilm scanners for the last year. There are four major companies that produce microform scanners. Mekel (a Crowley Company), Wicks and Wilson , nextScan ,and Sunrise . They each have their advantages and disadvantages. Both nextScan and Sunrise have 3-in-1 or 2-in-1 models, where you have one machine (~$100,000) that comes with one attachment, and you buy other attachments for different types of microform (Microfilm, Microfiche, and Aperture card). Each attachment costs extra. I never figured out the cost for the attachments. nextScan also has a dedicated roll film scanner , that I’ve heard good reviews from the Newspaper Digitization Project in Australia . In general, I have heard that the 3-in-1 or 2-in-1 machines are fine, but they tend to go slower than dedicated machines. They really are built for versatility and marketed toward libraries who can only afford one machine that can do all types (Paying $100,000+ for one

Bureau of Indian Affairs- Digital Collection

The Bureau of Indian Affairs is one of the oldest Bureaus in the United States.  It was established in 1824 by Secretary of War John C. Calhoun . While the history of the organization has been controversial, their records are open to the public.  This collection brings together letters distributed from the Bureau of Indian Affairs starting in 1832 and going on into 1966. View the rest of the collection:  http://bit.ly/2h0hKvW