Skip to main content

Microfilm and Microfiche scanners

I have been researching high speed microfiche and microfilm scanners for the last year. There are four major companies that produce microform scanners. Mekel (a Crowley Company), Wicks and Wilson, nextScan ,and Sunrise . They each have their advantages and disadvantages.

Both nextScan and Sunrise have 3-in-1 or 2-in-1 models, where you have one machine (~$100,000) that comes with one attachment, and you buy other attachments for different types of microform (Microfilm, Microfiche, and Aperture card). Each attachment costs extra. I never figured out the cost for the attachments. nextScan also has a dedicated roll film scanner, that I’ve heard good reviews from the Newspaper Digitization Project in Australia.

In general, I have heard that the 3-in-1 or 2-in-1 machines are fine, but they tend to go slower than dedicated machines. They really are built for versatility and marketed toward libraries who can only afford one machine that can do all types (Paying $100,000+ for one machine that can do 3 formats might be a better buy than buying three machines at $60-80,000 each- is the idea).

For dedicated Microfiche machines, take a look at the Mekel and Wicks and Wilson models. Both go for anywhere between $60,000 and $80,000, depending on the model (both companies have models of varying speed and quality- such as the Mekel Mach IV). The Mekel Mach VII (A microfiche scanner) is looking to be a very fast machine that has a lot of good options. I haven’t seen a Wicks and Wilson model in action, but I was very impressed when I saw the Mekel Mach VII model work in person.

For a slow option take a look at the ScanPro 1000. I have seen this one in a close up demo, and although it goes slow, it does scan roll film by itself. It can view and scan microfiche and micro opaque cards, but it will not do it automatically. It is good for public use, and I have heard of a few places using it for digitization projects, but not many. Expect to spend about $6,000-$9,000 on this scanner depending on the options you buy with it (The automatic film scanning attachment is extra).

Comments

Joy, great post.

We run the Sunrise, Wicks & Wilson and nextScan film scanners in our conversion center. They all do an adequate job, but we have found the Sunrise scanners to be the best for a variety of reasons:

- The image quality is superior and there are more post-processing options for cleaning up the images after the scan is complete
- There are a number of options for having the machine serviced (unlike the nextScan which is very hard to get help with)
- For a high-production environment the Sunrise is the way to go for a 3-in-1 solution (microfilm, microfiche and aperture cards).

However, if you are just running roll microfilm 16MM or 35MM the speed and quality from the nextScan is the best.

An alternative option to purchasing a microform scanner would be to use a service company like Digital Film Solutions. We have invested in the technology, have the expertise and can convert microform records for very competitive rates, typically much less than the cost of purchasing the equipment and trying to do it in-house (as low as $.009 per image for roll film and $.03 per image for microfiche).

All the best!

Josh Nelson
Digital Film Solutions
www.digitalfilmsolutions.com
866-609-4337
Joy said…
Thank you for the added information Josh.
Joy said…
I actualy managed to miss a company. S-T Imagining
http://www.stimaging.com/ST200X/

It's a 2in1 or 3in1 model for about $95,000 or less.
St said…
Thanks for sharing the information about Scanners. You can share more information about. Microfilm Scanners

Popular posts from this blog

Ex Libris Digital Preservation system

Today I attended a webinar from Sun Microsystems about the new Ex Libris Digital Preservation system. You can view the webinar here . The talking points are they handle all the hardware and they can handle the software. They claim it’s secure and built with redundancy. The major problem is that they say you can’t provide access to the files without getting Primo (Ex Libris’s new Amazon-like catalog toy-which is looking fun). They won’t convert the files for you when the formats out of style, but they make it so that you can maintain and upgrade the files. All and all, I like the idea of a comprehensive digital preservation system being handled by people who know hardware. I Just think it is going to be too expensive for most libraries. Time will tell how many libraries pick this up.

Atiz scanner and Kirtas scanner aren’t playing nice with eachother

I love the Atiz scanner for it's simplicity, good design, and utility. I love the Kirtas scanners for their speed and their "wow" factor when people see the things work. The only problem I have at the moment is taking our current Kirtas workflow (using Kirtas's software Bookscan Editor, Superbatch, and OCR manager), and finding a way to make the Atiz scanner workflow work with it. The Atiz machine came with a hefty batch editing program that does a great job of cleaning up the images and making them wonderfully presentable. The machine even came with a PDF maker, but it doesn't OCR on its own, and it doesn't give you the options that Kirtas' OCR manager do. So, I want to process the Atiz scanner finished images using Kirtas’s OCR manager. However, that seems to be more difficult than I had first expected. For the next month, I’ll be trying to figure out how to make this marriage of Atiz and Kirtas systems work. If it ends up failing, then I may have t