Skip to main content

Kirtas Speed experiment

I haven’t updated in a while. I’ve been training students, and teaching the students to train other students.

The lab that I run doubled the size of it's workforce in a month. We went from 18 people to 36.

I had estimated taht, in a perfect world, we would be able to scan 128 books a day. After the last month, I don’t feel that this number is practical. Our lab has been able to reach 57 books finished (from beginning to end) every day with two Kirtas APT 2400 book scanners.

There are many reasons why I don’t think we’ll get close to 128 books finished or scanned a day. The biggest reason is that our workforce consists of mostly students, and I have no guarantee that I can keep someone at the machines even 80% of the time. I can’t make transitions between users seamless, so there will always be downtime when one person leaves and another person comes in to replace them.

But, 57 books finished a day is a good amount. That’s 1710 books a month.

Comments

Leucophyllum said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Leucophyllum said…
I think it is interesting to take the theory number (that you posted in Feb) and compare it with the practice number. Often people will be so focused on the theory being right that they will not accept the reality of the situation.

I'm glad that you can see the reasons why things won't work in a not-so-perfect world like ours. :)

Popular posts from this blog

Microfilm and Microfiche scanners

I have been researching high speed microfiche and microfilm scanners for the last year. There are four major companies that produce microform scanners. Mekel (a Crowley Company), Wicks and Wilson , nextScan ,and Sunrise . They each have their advantages and disadvantages. Both nextScan and Sunrise have 3-in-1 or 2-in-1 models, where you have one machine (~$100,000) that comes with one attachment, and you buy other attachments for different types of microform (Microfilm, Microfiche, and Aperture card). Each attachment costs extra. I never figured out the cost for the attachments. nextScan also has a dedicated roll film scanner , that I’ve heard good reviews from the Newspaper Digitization Project in Australia . In general, I have heard that the 3-in-1 or 2-in-1 machines are fine, but they tend to go slower than dedicated machines. They really are built for versatility and marketed toward libraries who can only afford one machine that can do all types (Paying $100,000+ for one

Atiz scanner and Kirtas scanner aren’t playing nice with eachother

I love the Atiz scanner for it's simplicity, good design, and utility. I love the Kirtas scanners for their speed and their "wow" factor when people see the things work. The only problem I have at the moment is taking our current Kirtas workflow (using Kirtas's software Bookscan Editor, Superbatch, and OCR manager), and finding a way to make the Atiz scanner workflow work with it. The Atiz machine came with a hefty batch editing program that does a great job of cleaning up the images and making them wonderfully presentable. The machine even came with a PDF maker, but it doesn't OCR on its own, and it doesn't give you the options that Kirtas' OCR manager do. So, I want to process the Atiz scanner finished images using Kirtas’s OCR manager. However, that seems to be more difficult than I had first expected. For the next month, I’ll be trying to figure out how to make this marriage of Atiz and Kirtas systems work. If it ends up failing, then I may have t

Bureau of Indian Affairs- Digital Collection

The Bureau of Indian Affairs is one of the oldest Bureaus in the United States.  It was established in 1824 by Secretary of War John C. Calhoun . While the history of the organization has been controversial, their records are open to the public.  This collection brings together letters distributed from the Bureau of Indian Affairs starting in 1832 and going on into 1966. View the rest of the collection:  http://bit.ly/2h0hKvW