Skip to main content

Digitizing/Displaying Objects

I’ve been considering how to digitize and display objects, mostly because I have an object project that is coming my way. Our original plan was to put a 3D scan of the object on-line, but any 3D scanner that we could afford wasn’t going to be good enough, so I’ve been looking at different options.

Option 1-Just pictures

We could just take a few pictures of the object with a neutral background and good lighting. In this case we would treat the collection more like an image collection.

Option 2- Flash application

My husband and I were looking for cameras and we found this site for Olympus cameras. The cameras are ok, but what I was really surprised about was the display!

You can click on the camera and move it around, seeing all different sides. Some of my colleges assumed that it was a 3D model, but I could tell that it was just a series of images taken and strung together using a flash application. At work, we are working on implementing this for at least our first object collection.

I’m planning on getting a cheap turn table (for a kitchen table), covering it with neutral gray paper, marking it around with 365 degrees, and then taking 365 photos of the object from slightly different angles. Once I start this, I’ll probably post pictures and a step by step process.
While I’m doing that, one of our IT people, or our Metadata librarians, are going to be researching the flash application to see how easy it will be to string the images together. This should be fun.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ex Libris Digital Preservation system

Today I attended a webinar from Sun Microsystems about the new Ex Libris Digital Preservation system. You can view the webinar here . The talking points are they handle all the hardware and they can handle the software. They claim it’s secure and built with redundancy. The major problem is that they say you can’t provide access to the files without getting Primo (Ex Libris’s new Amazon-like catalog toy-which is looking fun). They won’t convert the files for you when the formats out of style, but they make it so that you can maintain and upgrade the files. All and all, I like the idea of a comprehensive digital preservation system being handled by people who know hardware. I Just think it is going to be too expensive for most libraries. Time will tell how many libraries pick this up.
5 comments
Read more

Atiz scanner and Kirtas scanner aren’t playing nice with eachother

I love the Atiz scanner for it's simplicity, good design, and utility. I love the Kirtas scanners for their speed and their "wow" factor when people see the things work. The only problem I have at the moment is taking our current Kirtas workflow (using Kirtas's software Bookscan Editor, Superbatch, and OCR manager), and finding a way to make the Atiz scanner workflow work with it. The Atiz machine came with a hefty batch editing program that does a great job of cleaning up the images and making them wonderfully presentable. The machine even came with a PDF maker, but it doesn't OCR on its own, and it doesn't give you the options that Kirtas' OCR manager do. So, I want to process the Atiz scanner finished images using Kirtas’s OCR manager. However, that seems to be more difficult than I had first expected. For the next month, I’ll be trying to figure out how to make this marriage of Atiz and Kirtas systems work. If it ends up failing, then I may have t
4 comments
Read more

Microfilm and Microfiche scanners

I have been researching high speed microfiche and microfilm scanners for the last year. There are four major companies that produce microform scanners. Mekel (a Crowley Company), Wicks and Wilson , nextScan ,and Sunrise . They each have their advantages and disadvantages. Both nextScan and Sunrise have 3-in-1 or 2-in-1 models, where you have one machine (~$100,000) that comes with one attachment, and you buy other attachments for different types of microform (Microfilm, Microfiche, and Aperture card). Each attachment costs extra. I never figured out the cost for the attachments. nextScan also has a dedicated roll film scanner , that I’ve heard good reviews from the Newspaper Digitization Project in Australia . In general, I have heard that the 3-in-1 or 2-in-1 machines are fine, but they tend to go slower than dedicated machines. They really are built for versatility and marketed toward libraries who can only afford one machine that can do all types (Paying $100,000+ for one
4 comments
Read more